國際標準化組織調查 ISO認證調查是一項年度調查，旨在統計全球范圍內有效ISO管理體系標準認證證書的數量。由國際認可論壇（IAF）多邊互認協議（MLA）成員認可的認證機構提供數據，這些數據隨后會被上傳至國際認可論壇的全球證書數據庫——IAFCertSearch.org。 2024年結果 2024 Results 總體數據 Overall figures 下表顯示了調查所覆蓋各標準的有效證書總數及站點總數。證書是指認證機構在客戶證明符合標準后頒發的文件，而"站點"是指組織開展工作或提供服務的固定場所。 The table below displays the total number of valid certificates and the total number of sites for each standard covered by the survey. A certificate is the document issued by a certification body once the client has demonstrated conformity to the standard and a "site" is a permanent location where an organization carries out work or provides a service. 全部結果 Full results 每個標準的詳細結果可在https://iafcertsearch.org/services/iso-survey.對于每種標準，證書數量和站點數量都會并排顯示。 The detailed results for each standard are available on https://iafcertsearch.org/services/iso-survey. For each of the standards, the number of certificates and the number of sites are displayed next to each other. IAF證書搜索 IAF CertSearch 對于2024年及以后的調查，ISO調查將直接從國際認可論壇（IAF）認證管理體系認證全球數據庫IAF CertSearch中的匿名匯總數據中編譯。 For the 2024 survey and onwards, the ISO Survey will be compiled directly from anonymised, aggregated data in IAF CertSearch, the International Accreditation Forum’s (IAF) global database of accredited management system certifications. IAF CertSearch是一個全面且值得信賴的全球認證覆蓋源，提供最完整、最新的結果，同時簡化和減輕認證機構的報告負擔。 IAF CertSearch is a comprehensive and trusted source of global certification coverage, delivering the most complete, up-to-date results while streamlining and reducing the reporting burden for certification bodies. 注：IAF CertSearch由ISO和IAF的聯合合作伙伴Quality Trade開發和運營。 Note: IAF CertSearch is developed and operated by Quality Trade, the joint partner of both ISO and IAF. 結果亮點 Results highlights 77個認證機構中有76個及其2400多個認證機構參加了IAF CertSearch，表明其在全球范圍內得到了廣泛采用。 76 of the 77 accreditation bodies and their 2,400+ certification bodies participated in IAF CertSearch, demonstrating strong global adoption. 今年的結果受到德國DAkkS認證機構缺席的影響，這些機構無法通過IAF CertSearch共享ISO調查的數據。雖然DAkkS下的一些認證機構主動直接與IAF CertSearch共享結果，但并非所有機構都這樣做。所有DAkkS認證機構的缺失對德國的統計數據產生了影響。 This year’s results were impacted by the missing participation of Germany’s DAkkS certification bodies, who were unable to share data for the ISO Survey via IAF CertSearch. While some certification bodies under DAkkS proactively shared results directly with IAF CertSearch, not all did. The absence of all DAkkS certification bodies had an impact on German statistics. 中國與IAF CertSearch合作參加了今年的ISO調查。這加強了調查結果的準確性，數據來源于官方政府機構，并得到了CNAS關于以下標準的認證信息和現場估計的補充：ISO 9001、ISO 14001、ISO 45001、ISO/IEC 27001、ISO 22000、ISO 50001和ISO/IEC 20000-1。此外，所有標準都包括由CNAS以外的認證機構認證的認證機構上傳到IAF CertSearch的數據。應該指出的是，CNAS沒有為一些沒有信息的標準提供數據。 China participated in this year’s ISO Survey in collaboration with IAF CertSearch. This strengthened the accuracy of the survey results, with data sourced from the official government authority, complemented by input from CNAS regarding accreditation information and site estimates for the following standards: ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22000, ISO 50001, and ISO/IEC 20000-1. In addition, data uploaded to IAF CertSearch by certification bodies accredited by accreditation bodies other than CNAS was included for all standards. It should be noted that CNAS did not provide data for some standards where information was not available. ISO 28000的數據尚未完全填充，這可能會在下一次調查中增加。 Data for ISO 28000 has not been fully populated, this will likely increase in the next survey. 免責聲明 Disclaimer ISO調查基于IAF CertSearch的數據，這是一個官方的全球認證數據庫。IAF CertSearch主要由認可的認證機構在其監督下填充。雖然絕大多數認證機構已經上傳了他們的數據，但一小部分尚未完成這一過程。因此，有限數量的證書可能尚未反映在數據庫中，因此也未反映在調查中。 The ISO Survey is based on data from IAF CertSearch, the official global database of accredited certification. IAF CertSearch is populated primarily by accredited certification bodies, under the oversight of their accreditation bodies. While the vast majority of certification bodies have uploaded their data, a small percentage have not yet completed this process. As a result, a limited number of certificates may not yet be reflected in the database and therefore the survey. 對結果的解釋和對趨勢的任何結論都應考慮到，覆蓋范圍可能因國家、行業和標準而異。 Interpretations of the results and any conclusions on trends should take into account that coverage may vary slightly across countries, industries, and standards. 
